*****Bitcoins: money coins or fake money?******

Poor Bitcoin. It’s like Rodney Dangerfield: it can not get any respect. Not from the individuals who could simply take it to the next level anyway. And the very reason some touted it as the easiest way to go currency around online may be the exact explanation it’ll never attain conventional acceptance. At the least, in accordance with founder that is nTrust CEO Robert MacGregor, who’s additionally a technology and alternative payments lawyer. The online vault systems founder (nTrust is not available in the U.S.) has some strong opinions on Bitcoins and exactly why they stay lukewarm in reception overall to the world wide web monetary trade universe.

Still Struggling for Mainstream Recognition

MacGregor recently coined an op-ed piece on Bitcoins, and shared his thoughts on why they will probably never be accepted by the mainstream banking worldwide entities as a currency that is real. MacGregor says the issue isn’t whether Bitcoins have enjoyed some acceptance, but whether they will ever get sufficient acceptance to matter, and his response is: not so much. And he’s not the one that is only believes so, either.

The nTrust CEO ascertains that, by the concept of money as something which you can use to acquire things, Bitcoins have failed miserably. And to measure that, MacGregor claims, all you have to do is check the relatively tiny number of merchants whom accept Bitcoin, and, more to the point, the virtually nonexistent number of major merchants -such as Amazon et al who allow it at all.

MacGregor continues by saying that, although some have actually stated Bitcoins merely require time to be much more generally speaking embraced by the Internet commerce public, he just does not see it ever taking place. And there are a number of reasons behind that, the first being the merchant barriers towards using Bitcoins as being a monetary exchange option.

MacGregor uses Amazon certainly generally recognized as one of the earth’s leading merchants that are online an instance of why Bitcoins haven’t taken off. As an example, Amazon pays hundreds of millions in credit card deal fees and credit that is reimbursing fraud, also as to the employees and management systems needed to allow it to be all work. With typical processing costs averaging down to about 2-3 percent for such a massive Internet merchant, you’d think a no-fee payment option like Bitcoins would be appealing to Amazon, but it is perhaps not.

Barriers to Adoption

A combination of uncertain liquidity ( the ability to convert Bitcoins into a more usable form of cash that could be deposited in a bank, for example) and the unrealistic (and fallible that is already proven assertion that Bitcoins will usually remain outside the long supply for the law, are the primary hurdles to mainstream acceptance. A department that is recent of Grand Jury research in Maryland into Mt. Gox, the world’s biggest Bitcoin exchange, has already busted that myth into smithereens.

And aided by the DoJ cracking down difficult on anything that can and happens to be employed for money laundering, terrorist and/or criminal acquisitions things that Bitcoin, using its somewhat cloaked layer of anonymity, has inherent in its distribution structure an organization like Amazon would never expose itself to the scrutiny, or the risk, of a complete research.

Archbishop of Canterbury Says Church Can Invest in Gambling and Porn

*****Chaucer’s bawdy stories might be inspiring the Church of England’s investment policies******

The Archbishop of Canterbury was recently left blushing with embarrassment after it absolutely was found that the Church of England had bankrolled Wonga, some of those pay day loan businesses that are known for resulting in more debt than they solve. With their sky-high interest fees and advertisement that is annoyingly catchy, their M.O. is to attract in punters who already are clearly in the edge of bankruptcy, as they turn to the ‘instant cash’ solution.

Information of the £75,000 ($114, 350 US) investment broke just 1 day after the Most Reverend Justin Welby publicly pledged to ‘compete’ the pay day loan company away from business by opening a network of parish churches to promote credit unions working not-for-profit. The Church of England’s investing power is nothing to sneeze at, that’s for sure with a total £5.5 billion ($8.4 billion US) investment portfolio.

The oilman-turned-Archbishop announced which he was ‘irritated’ at the emergence associated with news, and that the Church could be scrutinizing its assets to decide ‘how much sin’ can be tolerated. The Church has previously been quite vocal in its moral assessments about investments, which means this new ‘what is it possible to do’ philosophy is one those things that produce you go ‘hmmmmmm.’

Cashes to cashes, bust to breasts

In addition to the cash advance company, the Archbishop also announced that it is not against the rules to invest in companies involved in gambling. Yet more stunning was his announcement that the Church of England can also purchase businesses that promote porn, which appears to tick even more boxes in the ‘thou shalt not’ category. Oh, the sticky issues of the Church investment policy.

‘ We are going to have to review these known levels and how we do so,’ stated the Archbishop during a BBC radio interview, whenever asked when it is theologically sound for the Church to invest in gambling and pornography. ‘ The reality is, if you invest in a hotel chain, a complete large amount of hotel chains offer pornography in their hotel spaces. Would you consequently maybe not invest in any hotel chains at all?

‘If you exclude any contact with anything that directly or indirectly gets in almost any means bad, you can’t do anything more,’ he said, stating it is almost impossible for the Church to make an investment that has been not tainted in certain method. Cash is, most likely, the basis of most wicked; but churches, like everybody else, have bills to cover. Such a conundrum.

Perhaps we’ll soon see blinking lights on Westminster Abbey, beckoning in punters for a spin of the roulette wheel and a lapdance during the same time. Well, after all, bingo happens to be accepted for eons, so it’s type of just like a starter drug. Or maybe even a new online website geared towards the religious gamblers on the market, with a possible name like prayyouwin.com.

Penny Wise, But Sounds Foolish

While it’s tough to link a company such as Wonga to your porn industry, it is not difficult to suppose many taking up the offer of easy and cash that is instant possibly found on their own for the reason that situation due to reckless online gambling. And surely anything that places the Church in a place where they are seen to be encouraging, and even profiting from, the misfortune of irresponsibility, means that a business which is supposed to hold itself in high regard that is moral acting questionably at least.

And also at a time when Prime Minister David Cameron has established royal vegas login policy that is pending block pornography from being accessed unless a phone call to unlock content is made, it all seems a tad ironic.

Daniel Negreanu Disses Tom Dwan; But Is It For Genuine or For Show?

*****Daniel Negreanu has some choice words for Tom Dwan*****

Top-ranked poker pro Daniel Negreanu is at it again. The Canadian player has never been known not to talk his head with regards to other players behaving badly (having previously described complete Tilt pros Howard Lederer and Chris ‘Jesus’ Ferguson as ‘absolute, flat-out scumbags’); but now it’s legendary online pro Tom ‘durrrr’ Dwan whom is the topic for the vegan poker player’s wrath. In a interview with PokerPlayer magazine, Negreanu dissed his fellow Rational Group (PokerStars’ and complete Tilt’s joint parent company) compensated shill.

Late for an important that is very

Seems while shooting footage for a ‘grudge match’ between Dwan (who represents Full Tilt, which will be technically owned by PokerStars, but run as an entity that is separate and Negreanu (who represents PokerStars), that Dwan arrived four hours late, ticking off the Canadian with his New Jersey boorish ways. (We have always secretly thought Dwan is actually Spock’s love child from ‘Star Trek,’ but that’s another story completely).

‘then you had better do those things or you are disrespecting your organization and the game if you’re a sponsored player and you get paid. In the event that you are not ready to accomplish that, then don’t wear the patch,’said Negreanu in contempt of his competitor Dwan.

But Daniel did not just stop with smacking durrrr for his tardiness; he went on to actually dis his poker play.

‘I don’t think Tom is certainly one of the best [in the entire world] I don’t know if he ever was,’ Negreanu said within the interview that is heated. Inform us how you sense, Daniel.

Genuine, or fight that is staged?

Naturally, within the pugilistic world of poker, it took about 2.5 seconds for individuals to take edges; after all, unlike the Lederer/Ferguson debacle, Dwan has only taken money out of players’ pockets that he won fair and square, typically in the cash games of which many consider him to be a master. Not helping their case was the actual fact that Negreanu has, into the past, praised Dwan to the skies, causing some speculation that some sort of ‘WWE’-type cartoon wrestling dis could be going on here.

Back in 2010, Negreanu penned that he’d learned a great deal from a no that is three-day Hold’em session with Dwan, Patrik Antonius and Phil Ivey; can his viewpoint have changed so totally three years later? And also the same year, the Canadian ranked this new Jerseyite as a ‘great player’ and place him in a set of his top-ranked young poker pros. We’re hearing bells go off in the wrestling ring and seeing some physical body slams that may look a little forced.

This all begs the question, how much of poker at the level that is pro ‘entertainment,’ and exactly how much is pure gameplay, particularly as the uber-competitive world of online poker slowly reemerges in America? And even though many purists have actually raged for years for the latter (making the existing ESPN coverage of World Series of Poker incredibly dull as a result), it is a game played by larger-than-life characters, whom, while real people, are players in a bigger universe that often does take on a rather cartoon-y quality.

For the very reason why, like Greek deities or WWE wrestlers, pro poker players represent plenty human qualities: greed, passion, talent, poor choices, incredible good or bad luck, sloth and so forth, they become archetypes we can all relate with in one way or another. Rational Group may be very smart to touch into the desire for feuds in the spirit that is human or, Daniel Negreanu may just have changed his brain. You decide.

 

Leave a Reply